Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) Programme Annual Report 2023-24 in Tamil
- Tamil Tax upate News
- January 15, 2025
- No Comment
- 6
- 139 minutes read
The Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) Programme, introduced by India’s Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in 2012, aims to foster tax certainty and resolve transfer pricing disputes for multinational enterprises (MNEs). The Annual Report 2023-24 highlights a record 641 APAs signed to date, covering over 3,400 assessment years. In FY 2023-24 alone, 86 Unilateral APAs (UAPAs) and 39 Bilateral APAs (BAPAs) were finalized, marking the programme’s most successful year. These agreements provide clarity on arm’s length pricing for cross-border transactions, thus mitigating potential litigation. Major sectors benefiting include IT, engineering, and banking. The APA Programme not only enhances India’s ease of doing business but also ensures steady tax revenues, estimated at Rs. 7,500 crores to date. The report reflects the growing trust between taxpayers, CBDT, and India’s treaty partners, further strengthening international tax compliance frameworks.
Advance Pricing Agreement
(APA)
Programme of India
Annual Report
(2023-24)
Central Board of Direct Taxes
November, 2024
Foreword by the Chairman, CBDT
The Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) programme of the CBDT, is one of its leading programmes for fostering a tax regime in India that provides an investor conducive environment. 641 APAs have been entered into by the CBDT till March, 2024, which demonstrates the widespread acceptance of the programme by taxpayers and stakeholders alike. In continuation of the exemplary performance last year, FY 2023-24 witnessed the highest number of APA signings in any single year since the commencement of the APA programme.
Over more than a decade long period of its existence, the APA programme has contributed significantly to the Government of India’s mission of promoting ease of doing business, especially for Multi-National Enterprises (MNEs), which have transactions spanning across borders, within their group entities. Each signed APA brings tax certainty for a taxpayer that spans multiple years. The number of APAs signed till date have cumulatively brought about certainty to taxpayers for more than 3,400 Assessment Years.
Apart from running the Unilateral leg of the APA programme successfully, the CBDT has also actively engaged with its various tax treaty partners to negotiate and enter into Bilateral APAs, which provide taxpayers an added benefit of relieving double taxation and providing tax certainty in both treaty partner jurisdictions. The year also saw a record number of bilateral agreements signed, which is also a testament to the strengthening of our relationship with taxpayers and treaty partners.
As we release this Report, I would like to place on record my appreciation of the hard work and dedication of the officers in the Foreign Tax & Tax Research Division of the CBDT and the officers in the APA teams under Principal CCIT (International Taxation). I would also like to thank the taxpayers for being equal and active partners in this programme. CBDT will continue to strive towards further increasing the efficacy of the APA programme and attain more expedient outcomes going forward. All feedback/suggestions on this Report are welcome, and will help us in further strengthening the APA programme.
Ravi Agrawal
Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes
Ministry of Finance, Government of India
Preface by Member (L), CBDT
The Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) programme was introduced in India through Finance Act, 2012 with a view to fulfil the objectives of tax certainty and double taxation avoidance – two key focus areas of the CBDT for several years now. Being founded on principles of mutual co-operation and trust between taxpayers and revenue authorities, the programme has strengthened the Indian tax administration’s orientation of enabling and empowering, the growth of our taxpayers.
The programme has constantly strived for a meticulous, positive, fact-intensive and collaborative perspective on transfer pricing, aided by consultation and a desire on convergence and acceptability of outcomes. Thus, a more cooperative rather than adversarial approach, forms the cornerstone of the APA programme.
It gives me immense pleasure to present this sixth Annual Report (for FY 2023-24) of the Indian APA programme. This Annual Report presents abundant numerical data and detailed analysis that confirms the immense popularity and acceptability of the APA programme in India. The year FY 2023-24 in particular has been one of resounding success for the programme with several milestones in terms of number of signings surpassed in unilateral as well as bilateral agreements.
I would like to congratulate the officers in the Foreign Tax & Tax Research Division of the CBDT and the APA teams under Principal CCIT (International Taxation) for their successful work. This financial year has been a record-breaking year for the APA programme in many respects, with the highest number of signings in any year in the history of the programme, for which I would like to put on record my special appreciation for the dedication and hard work of the officers, as well as the positive support extended by taxpayers and tax consultants. I would specifically also like to thank our taxpayers for reposing their faith in the APA programme and extending their full-fledged cooperation in ensuring that the programme continues to be a success.
R. N. Parbat
Member (Legislation), Central Board of Direct Taxes
Ministry of Finance, Government of India
Chapter 1: APA Programme of India – Introduction
An Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) is an agreement between the tax administration and a person (taxpayer), which determines, in advance, the Arm’s Length Price (ALP) or specifies the manner of the determination of ALP (or both), in relation to an international transaction1. APA programmes are operational in a number of countries for a long time. The primary goal of such programmes is to provide certainty to taxpayers in respect of the pricing of cross-border transactions undertaken by taxpayers with their group entities.
Unprecedented growth in international trade involving cross-border transactions within group entities has given rise to numerous tax disputes on the issue of transfer pricing. An APA is a mechanism to resolve transfer pricing disputes in advance, i.e., before the cross-border related party transaction actually takes place or, at least, before a dispute arises in respect of such cross-border transaction. The transfer price of goods and services transacted between group entities is decided in advance by the tax authorities and the taxpayers, so as to prevent any dispute arising from such transfer pricing.
The APA programme is carried out in India with a legislative mandate under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was launched in 2012 through the insertion of sections 92CC and 92CD in the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the Finance Act, 2012. These statutory provisions, effective from 1st July, 2012, lent the legal backing to the CBDT to enter into APAs with taxpayers for a maximum period of 5 years in respect of international transactions between Associated Enterprises (AEs) to determine the ALP or to specify the manner in which the ALP is to be determined.
Vide notification no. 36/2012 [F. No. 133/5/2012-SO(TPL)]/SO 2005 (E), dated 30th August, 2012, the APA Scheme [Rules 10F to 10T] was inserted in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 to operationalize the APA programme. Thus, the Indian APA programme, which commenced from 1st July, 2012, became fully functional and operational from 30th August, 2012 with the notification of the rules. The rules deal with the various procedural aspects of the APA process, including procedures for filing of pre-filing consultation application; pre-filing consultation; payments of fees; filing of APA application; processing of APA application; withdrawal of APA application; terms and conditions of APA; filing of Annual Compliance Report; Compliance Audit; revision, cancellation and renewal of APA; etc.
Rollback provisions allow the ALP or the methodology for determining the ALP as agreed to in the APA, to be rolled back to a period prior to the commencement of the APA. Roll-back of APAs was announced by the Government on 10th July, 2014. The necessary legislative changes in this regard were carried out through the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014. The amendment to the Income-tax Rules, 1962 for implementing the Roll-back provisions were notified on 14th March, 2015 and the existing APA Scheme got amended accordingly. The Rollback provisions are applicable for a maximum of four years prior to the first year of the APA period. Thus, a taxpayer would be able to have certainty in matters of transfer pricing for a maximum period of 9 years at any one time by applying for an APA with Rollback provisions. Circular No. 10 of 2015 was issued by the CBDT on 10th June, 2015 to provide clarity on Rollback issues in the form of answers to FAQs.
Under the Indian APA programme, APAs can be unilateral, involving the CBDT only, or bilateral, involving CBDT and the tax authorities of another country. Bilateral APAs are based on Agreements entered into by the Competent Authority of India with the Competent Authority of the treaty partner jurisdiction, thereby extending tax certainty simultaneously in both the jurisdictions. Over the last 12 years, more than 1800 applications have been filed in India. About 75% of these are for unilateral APAs between the Indian taxpayer and the CBDT. Till 31st March, 2024, 641 Agreements have been entered into, of which 506 are unilateral and 135 are bilateral.
The APA applications are processed and analysed by dedicated APA teams working under the overall supervision of Pr. CCIT (International Taxation), New Delhi. Each APA team is headed by a Principal Commissioner/Commissioner of Income-tax. The team also comprises Addl./Joint Commissioners of Income-tax and Deputy/Asst. Commissioners of Income-tax. Presently, there are five APA teams. These teams are based in Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru and Gurgaon.
In respect of unilateral APAs (UAPAs), the position papers developed by the APA teams are approved by the Pr. CCIT (International Taxation), New Delhi and sent to the CBDT for approval. In the CBDT, officers of the Foreign Tax & Tax Research (FT & TR-I and II) Divisions examine and process the position papers/report received under Rule 10L. Joint Secretary, FT & TR-I and FT & TR-II review the examination done by the officers below and further process the position papers before sending it for final approval of the designated Member of the CBDT. The Member approves the final negotiating position to be adopted by the APA teams. Once the negotiation is complete, a draft Agreement is sent to the CBDT for approval. Thereafter, the Agreement is entered into between the CBDT and the taxpayer.
In respect of bilateral APAs (BAPAs), once the position papers are sent to the FT & TR-I & II Divisions by the Pr. CCIT (International Taxation), the Competent Authority of India (either Joint Secretary, FT & TR-I or Joint Secretary, FT & TR-II, depending upon the country with which the bilateral APA is to be negotiated) initiates discussions with their counterpart in the other country. The officers in the FT & TR Division of the CBDT working with the Competent Authority examine the position paper received from the Pr.CCIT (International Taxation) and prepare the position of the Indian Competent Authority. The same is shared with the Competent Authority of the other country. Once positions have been exchanged, the Competent Authorities of both countries discuss and negotiate the terms and conditions of the APA. If they reach an understanding, then a Mutual Agreement, containing the terms and conditions of the APA, is entered into by the Competent Authorities of both countries. Thereafter, each country usually enters into an Agreement with its own taxpayer. On the Indian side, the terms and conditions of the Mutual Agreement are shared with the taxpayer and its concurrence is sought within 30 days. Once the taxpayer agrees to the resolution reached in the Mutual Agreement, a draft Agreement is prepared in consultation with the Indian taxpayer and the same is submitted for the approval of the designated Member in the CBDT.
For both UAPAs and BAPAs, the Agreements are entered into by either Joint Secretary, FT & TR-I or Joint Secretary, FT & TR-II (the two Competent Authorities of India) with the taxpayer, on behalf of the CBDT.
The sixth Annual Report on the APA programme highlights the progress made in financial year 202324. This has been another successful year for the APA programme. This year again, CBDT recorded the highest ever APA signings in any financial year since the launch of the APA programme, signing a total of 125 APAs. This year, CBDT also signed the maximum number of BAPAs in any financial year till date, with the signing of 39 BAPAs. The BAPAs were signed as a consequence of entering into Mutual Agreements with India’s treaty partners namely Australia, Canada, Denmark, Japan, Singapore, the UK and the US. This was made possible by the efforts of the CBDT and its officers working in the Foreign Tax & Tax Research Division and the APA teams [under the Principal CCIT (International Taxation)]. The CBDT also acknowledges the cooperation and efforts of the taxpayers and their consultants in making the APA programme a success.
This Annual Report carries forward the CBDT’s unique initiative to bring into the public domain various statistical and qualitative aspects of India’s APA programme. The idea is to acknowledge that there is still a great scope for further improvements in this programme and encourage discussion and debate amongst taxpayers, policy makers, and economists, among others, on its strengths and weaknesses. This Annual Report also underlines the importance that the APA programme holds in the Government’s endeavour to promote and preserve a non-adversarial tax regime by working with the stakeholders.
Chapter 2: Data and Qualitative Analyses
2.1 Applications filed
The total number of applications filed on an annual basis can be seen from Table 2-1 and Figure 2-1 below. The total number of BAPA filings in FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24 has increased as seen from the rise in number of applications filed compared to previous years. Although premature to declare this as a trend based on one year, the shift towards BAPAs indicates confidence in the quick and efficient resolutions with many of our treaty partners.
Table 2-1 APA applications filed till 31.03.2024
Financial Year |
UAPA applications | BAPA applications | Total |
2012-13 | 97 | 37 | 135 |
2013-14 | 175 | 39 | 218 |
2014-15 | 169 | 30 | 203 |
2015-16 | 113 | 24 | 136 |
2016-17 | 80 | 25 | 106 |
2017-18 | 121 | 52 | 174 |
2018-19 | 124 | 47 | 170 |
2019-20 | 76 | 50 | 128 |
2020-21 | 100 | 33 | 134 |
2021-22 | 39 | 35 | 75 |
2022-23 | 116 | 77 | 195 |
2023-24 | 110 | 78 | 188 |
Total | 1320 | 527 | 1847 |
Figure 2-1 APA applications filed
2.2 Status of applications filed
Table 2-2 shows the status of applications filed. Out of a total 1847 applications filed till 31st March 2024, a total of 989 applications have been disposed and 858 applications are under processing. A comparison of applications filed, disposed, and under processing, is presented in Figure 2-2.
Table 2-2 Status of applications filed
Sr. No. | FY | Applications Filed (Post Conversion) |
Agreements Signed |
Applications disposed off due to other reasons |
Applications under processing |
1 | 2012-13 | 134 | 107 | 23 | 4 |
2 | 2013-14 | 214 | 130 | 69 | 15 |
3 | 2014-15 | 199 | 98 | 74 | 27 |
4 | 2015-16 | 137 | 65 | 56 | 16 |
5 | 2016-17 | 105 | 37 | 39 | 29 |
6 | 2017-18 | 173 | 47 | 36 | 90 |
7 | 2018-19 | 171 | 58 | 28 | 85 |
8 | 2019-20 | 126 | 41 | 8 | 77 |
9 | 2020-21 | 133 | 38 | 10 | 85 |
10 | 2021-22 | 74 | 11 | 2 | 61 |
11 | 2022-23 | 193 | 5 | 1 | 187 |
12 | 2023-24 | 188 | 4 | 2 | 182 |
Total | 1847 | 641 | 348 | 858 |
Figure 2-2 Status of applications filed from initiation of APA programme till 31.03.2024
2.3 Agreements signed: Year-wise
The number of agreements signed in various years of the APA programme are detailed in Table 2-3 and Figure 2-3 below. The number of APAs signed has continued to rise since FY 2021-22. After the record high in FY 2022-23, FY 2023-24 also saw the highest number of APAs signed. This year has also seen highest number of BAPAs ever signed. Additionally, signing of more than 100 APAs was a milestone achieved in this year.
Table 2-3 Agreements signed year wise
FY | UAPAs | BAPAs | Total |
2013-14 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
2014-15 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
2015-16 | 53 | 2 | 55 |
2016-17 | 80 | 8 | 88 |
2017-18 | 58 | 9 | 67 |
2018-19 | 41 | 11 | 52 |
2019-20 | 50 | 7 | 57 |
2020-21 | 18 | 13 | 31 |
2021-22 | 49 | 13 | 62 |
2022-23 | 63 | 32 | 95 |
2023-24 | 86 | 39 | 125 |
Total | 506 | 135 | 641 |
Figure 2-3 UAPAs and BAPAs signed since initiation of APA programme
2.4 Total covered years in Agreements signed
The impact of the APA programme in increasing the ease of doing business is evident from the number of years for which it has brought certainty in transfer pricing matters and reduced litigation. In its short period of existence in India, the APA programme has cumulatively brought about certainty for over 3400 years.
Particulars | APA years | Rollback Years | Total Years |
Agreements signed till 2022-23 | 2023 years | 693 years | 2716 years |
Agreements signed in 2023-24 | 603 years | 111 years | 714 years |
Total Agreements signed till 31st March 2024 | 2626 years | 804 years | 3430 years |
The APA programme is also an important tool to decongest the tax tribunals and higher judiciary of transfer pricing litigation. Even if we assume that only about half of these assessment years would have ended up in litigation, the APA programme has managed to prevent or resolve this litigation for more than 1700 assessment years. In other words, more than 1700 transfer pricing matters were prevented from getting into litigation. During the last financial year itself, the APA programme has provided tax certainty in respect of more than 700 assessment years.
Chapter 3: Unilateral APAs
3.1 Applications Filed
Statistics pertaining to UAPA applications are presented in Table 3-1. The number of applications filed in past years remains dynamic because of conversion of UAPAs into BAPAs and vice versa, physical verification of pendencies, etc.
Table 3-1 Applications filed (original and post-conversion)
Sr.No | F.Y | Application UAPA (Original) | Application UAPA (Post Conversion) |
1 | 2012-13 | 105 | 97 |
2 | 2013-14 | 188 | 175 |
3 | 2014-15 | 185 | 169 |
4 | 2015-16 | 120 | 113 |
5 | 2016-17 | 81 | 80 |
6 | 2017-18 | 120 | 121 |
7 | 2018-19 | 124 | 124 |
8 | 2019-20 | 73 | 76 |
9 | 2020-21 | 100 | 100 |
10 | 2021-22 | 39 | 39 |
11 | 2022-23 | 116 | 116 |
12 | 2023-24 | 110 | 110 |
Total | 1361 | 1320 |
3.2 Status of Applications Filed
The number of UAPAs disposed off and number of UAPAs still under processing are detailed in Table 3-2 and Figure 3-2 below. The figures therein represent the gradual and ongoing evolution of the APA Programme, its increasing efficacy as well as the further progress that needs to be aspired in respect of it. The disposal of applications filed in earlier years is high while number of cases still under processing is low. For recent years, a large proportion of cases are still under processing. One reason for this is that the processing of APAs involves conducting site visits, various due diligence processes, and multiple rounds of negotiations, and the need for different stakeholders to come to an agreement. All of these take time.
The number of pending applications also include cases where the applicant has not been responsive to queries of the APA team or has not shown much interest in engaging in the APA process, but has also not withdrawn its application, leading to a lack of progress. Nevertheless, the absolute number of APAs concluded has steadily risen over the past few years, showing progress in the speed and efficacy of their resolution. Nearly 20% of the applications under processing pertain to applications filed in March 2024 and so the processing in these cases is at a preliminary stage.
Table 3-2 Status of UAPAs filed
(A) | (B) | (C) | (D) | ||
Sr.No | F.Y | No. of Applications Filed (Post- Conversion) |
No. of Agreements Signed out of (A) |
No. of Applications Disposed of out of (A) due to other reasons | No. of Applications under Processing out of (A) |
1 | 2012-13 | 97 | 81 | 15 | 1 |
2 | 2013-14 | 175 | 117 | 55 | 3 |
3 | 2014-15 | 169 | 87 | 68 | 14 |
4 | 2015-16 | 113 | 50 | 50 | 13 |
5 | 2016-17 | 80 | 28 | 36 | 16 |
6 | 2017-18 | 121 | 35 | 32 | 54 |
7 | 2018-19 | 124 | 54 | 25 | 45 |
8 | 2019-20 | 76 | 32 | 7 | 37 |
9 | 2020-21 | 100 | 15 | 7 | 78 |
10 | 2021-22 | 39 | 2 | 2 | 35 |
11 | 2022-23 | 116 | 5 | 1 | 110 |
12 | 2023-24 | 110 | 0 | 2 | 108 |
Total | 1320 | 506 | 300 | 514 |
Figure 3-2 Status of UAPAs
3.3 Agreements Signed – Year wise
The number of UAPA agreements signed in various years are detailed in Table 3-3 and Figure 3-3. In FY 2023-24, the 86 agreements entered into have provided tax certainty for 420 APA years and 56 rollback years. A total of 17 APAs out of the 86 signed, also had a rollback term.
Table 3-3 UAPAs signed
FY | Agreements Signed |
2013-14 | 5 |
2014-15 | 3 |
2015-16 | 53 |
2016-17 | 80 |
2017-18 | 58 |
2018-19 | 41 |
2019-20 | 50 |
2020-21 | 18 |
2021-22 | 49 |
2022-23 | 63 |
2023-24 | 86 |
Total | 506 |
Figure 3-3 UAPAs signed
3.4 Duration of Processing
The number of UAPAs signed in FY 2023-24 segregated on the basis of duration taken from application to signing are mentioned in Table 3-4-1 below. It is seen that the average duration for closure of applications in FY 2023-24 is approximately 54.65 months. The average duration of processing on a cumulative basis is approximately 45.97 months. In the recent years, the focus of the APA programme has been on closure of backlog as well as more complex cases pending for a longer duration. The average duration of processing of cases in FY 2023-24, when compared to cumulative figure, highlights the impact of these factors.
Table 3-4-1 Duration of processing of UAPAs in FY 2023-24
Duration of processing | FY 2023-24 |
Within 12 Months | 3 |
13-24 Months | 2 |
25-36 Months | 18 |
37-48 Months | 16 |
49-60 months | 23 |
61-72 months | 10 |
More than 72 months | 14 |
Total | 86 |
Figure 3-4-1 The duration taken in processing and negotiation of UAPAs signed in FY 2023-24
The cumulative data on period of processing of all UAPAs signed till 31st March, 2024, is presented in Table 3-4-2 and Figure 3-4-2 hereunder:
Table 3-4-2 Cumulative data on period of processing for UAPAs signed till March 2024
Duration of processing | Agreements signed till 31st March 2024 |
Within 12 Months | 13 |
13-24 Months | 56 |
25-36 Months | 141 |
37-48 Months | 120 |
49-60 months | 75 |
61-72 months | 56 |
More than 72 months | 45 |
Total | 506 |
Figure 3-4-2 The duration taken in processing and negotiation of UAPAs signed till March 2024
3.5 Sectoral distribution of applicants
The primary economic activity of applicants in whose cases UAPAs were signed in FY 2023-24 are mentioned in Table 3-5 below. As can be seen, a majority of applications which culminated into agreement in FY 2023-24 pertain to the service sector. A majority of these, in turn, are captive companies involved in software development and IT enabled services. Some of these companies are also involved in engineering design services, contract R&D services, and Knowledge Process Outsourcing (KPO). It may be noted that 19 out of the 86 companies with which CBDT entered into agreements also have manufacturing activities. Further, 25 out of 86 companies are involved in trading activities. Hence, the entire spectrum of trading, manufacturing, and services, are covered under UAPAs signed.
Table 3-5 Number of UAPAs signed in FY 2023-24
Sr. No. | Economic Activity | Agreements signed |
1 | Service | 55 |
2 | Trading & Service | 9 |
3 | Manufacturing, Trading & Service | 8 |
4 | Manufacturing & Trading | 5 |
5 | Manufacturing & service | 4 |
6 | Trading | 3 |
7 | Manufacturing | 2 |
Total | 86 |
3.6 Industry-wise distribution of agreements
A majority of UAPAs signed in the financial year 2023-24 pertain to the I-T industry, banking & insurance, engineering services, telecommunication and power and energy. This reflects on the fact that India is a major outsourcing destination for information technology and business processes, and significant number of foreign MNEs have presence in I-T clusters of India such as Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, Gurgaon, and Noida. The industry-wise distribution of UAPAs is as given in Table 3-6 and Figure 3-6 below.
Table 3-6 Industry-wise distribution of UAPAs
Sr. No. | Industry | No. of Agreements Signed |
1 | Information Technology | 27 |
2 | Consultancy | 7 |
3 | Power & Energy | 5 |
4 | Engineering Services | 4 |
5 | Telecommunication | 4 |
6 | Trading & Logistics | 4 |
7 | Foods & Beverages | 4 |
8 | Industrial/Commercial Goods | 3 |
9 | Pharmaceutical | 3 |
10 | Consumer Goods | 2 |
11 | Media & entertainment | 3 |
12 | Automotive | 2 |
13 | Pumps | 2 |
14 | Banking & insurance | 2 |
15 | Healthcare | 2 |
16 | Paints & chemical | 1 |
17 | Others | 11 |
Total | 86 |
Figure 3-6 Industries that UAPAs signed in FY 2023-24 pertain to
3.7 Nature of Transactions Covered
The nature of the 224 international transactions covered by the 86 UAPAs signed in FY 2023-24 are mentioned in Table 3-7 and Figure 3-7 below. As can be seen from the table, a wide variety of transactions have been covered by the UAPAs signed in this year. A diversified basket of international transactions indicates the growing maturity of the APA programme and competence of the APA teams in processing applications that include complex transactions.
While captive services like SWD services and ITeS services are usually benchmarked at cost plus mark-up under the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM), the determination of arm’s length price for manufacturing, royalty transactions, IGS, etc. is more intricate. Some complex transactions need to be benchmarked using multiple methods (a primary method and a secondary method for sanity check).
Table 3-7 Nature of international transactions covered by UAPAs signed
Sr. No. | Covered Transaction | Total No. of Transactions |
1 | Provision of IT enabled services/back-office services | 27 |
2 | Reimbursement/ recovery of expenses | 27 |
3 | Provision of SWD services/ IT Support Services | 26 |
4 | Receipt of management/ corporate/other support services/IGS | 18 |
5 | Purchase of Capital goods/ assets/software | 15 |
6 | Provision of engineering design services / technical support/contract R&D services | 13 |
7 | Import/ purchase of ingredients/ raw materials/ consumables/components | 12 |
8 | Import of finished goods | 9 |
9 | Export/sale of semi-finished/finished goods | 9 |
10 | Provision of business support services | 7 |
11 | Payment for IT charges/IT services/shared cost | 7 |
12 | Payment of royalty/licence fee | 5 |
13 | Provision of marketing/consultancy services | 5 |
14 | Payment of charges/ commission | 5 |
15 | Trade Receivable/Payables | 4 |
16 | Payment of interest on borrowings/ECBs | 4 |
17 | Sale of ingredients/ raw materials/ consumables | 3 |
18 | Fixed Assets | 3 |
19 | Provision of installation, commissioning and other support services | 2 |
20 | Provision of finance/accounting support services | 2 |
21 | Provision of non-binding investment advisory service | 2 |
22 | Purchase of software licences | 2 |
23 | Receipt of application support services | 2 |
24 | Reimbursement of ESPP, RSU/ESOP paid/payable | 2 |
25 | Provision for Restricted Stock Units/Options/ESIP (RSU/Options) | 2 |
26 | Fee for provision of guarantee/LOC in support of AEs | 2 |
27 | Receipt of corporate guarantee fee | 1 |
28 | Receipt of subvention income | 1 |
29 | Receipt of licence fee | 1 |
30 | Receipt of commission | 1 |
31 | Receipt of interest | 1 |
32 | Purchase of online advertisement space and enterprise products | 1 |
33 | Provision of outsourcing services | 1 |
34 | Manufacturing of food products | 1 |
35 | Provision of procurement and support services | 1 |
Figure 3-7 Nature of international transactions covered by the signed UAPAs
3.8 Transfer Pricing Methodologies Used
A total of 224 transactions were benchmarked using 5 different methods, across the 86 UAPAs signed in the financial year. The various methods are given in Table 3-8 and Figure 3-8 below.
Table 3-8 TP methods used to benchmark international transactions
Sr. No | TP Methodology | No. of Transactions |
1 | TNM Method | 126 |
2 | Other Method | 90 |
3 | CUP Method | 6 |
4 | Cost Plus method | 2 |
5 | Resale Price Method | 0 |
Total | 224 |
Figure 3-8 Methods used to benchmark transactions in UAPA agreements
3.9 Location of AEs
The 86 UAPAs entered into in the financial year have AEs across 74 countries, as given in Table 3-9 below. Usually, a single APA covers AEs located in multiple jurisdictions. The transactions with these AEs could be the primary covered international transaction, or a closely linked transaction like reimbursement/recovery of expenses, etc. In a majority of cases, AEs are located in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, etc. The APA applicants are usually a part of MNE groups, whose parent jurisdictions are in these countries. Many AEs are also located in investment and business hubs such as Singapore, Hong Kong, and Ireland.
Table 3-9: Location of AEs
Sr. No. |
Countries | Number of Agreements |
1 | USA | 51 |
2 | Singapore | 35 |
3 | UK | 37 |
4 | Australia | 22 |
5 | Hong Kong | 13 |
6 | Netherlands | 19 |
7 | China | 17 |
8 | France | 15 |
9 | Japan | 11 |
10 | Switzerland | 10 |
11 | Canada | 14 |
12 | Germany | 22 |
13 | Ireland | 5 |
14 | Belgium | 8 |
15 | Italy | 11 |
16 | Malaysia | 13 |
17 | Thailand | 6 |
18 | Indonesia | 9 |
19 | UAE | 8 |
20 | Taiwan | 5 |
21 | Brazil | 7 |
22 | Finland | 2 |
23 | Portugal | 3 |
24 | South Africa | 7 |
25 | South Korea | 9 |
26 | Spain | 6 |
27 | Sweden | 10 |
28 | New Zealand | 2 |
29 | Philippines | 8 |
30 | Poland | 10 |
31 | Chile | 2 |
32 | Denmark | 3 |
33 | Hungary | 4 |
34 | Mexico | 5 |
35 | Saudi Arabia | 3 |
36 | Austria | 5 |
37 | Argentina | 4 |
38 | Czech Republic | 2 |
39 | Luxembourg | 6 |
40 | Peru | 1 |
41 | Qatar | 1 |
42 | Russia | 3 |
43 | Turkey | 4 |
44 | Bermuda | 1 |
45 | Dubai | 1 |
46 | Israel | 6 |
47 | Mauritius | 3 |
48 | Morocco | 1 |
49 | Norway | 3 |
50 | Vietnam | 7 |
51 | Colombia | 2 |
52 | Cyprus | 2 |
53 | Greece | 1 |
54 | Jersey | 1 |
55 | Oman | 1 |
56 | Pakistan | 1 |
57 | Romania | 3 |
58 | Zambia | 1 |
59 | Malawi | 1 |
60 | Tanzania | 1 |
61 | Zimbabwe | 1 |
62 | Botswana | 1 |
63 | Ghana | 2 |
64 | Myanmar | 1 |
65 | Malta | 1 |
66 | Egypt | 2 |
67 | Congo | 1 |
68 | Angola | 1 |
69 | Nigeria | 1 |
70 | Kenya | 1 |
71 | British Virgin Island | 1 |
72 | Kazakhstan | 1 |
73 | Bolivia | 1 |
74 | Bulgaria | 3 |
Chapter 4: Bilateral APAs
4.1 Applications Filed
BAPA applications filed in various years, and UAPA applications filed in various years but subsequently converted into BAPA applications are detailed in Table 4-1. This financial year has also seen a rise in BAPA filings, with 78 new applications being received. This demonstrates the trust reposed in the bilateral process by our taxpayers, and reflects deeper relationships with our treaty partners, leading to quicker resolutions.
Table 4-1 Number of BAPA applications filed
FY | Applications (Original) |
Applications (After Conversions) |
2012-13 | 29 | 37 |
2013-14 | 26 | 39 |
2014-15 | 14 | 30 |
2015-16 | 17 | 24 |
2016-17 | 24 | 25 |
2017-18 | 53 | 52 |
2018-19 | 47 | 47 |
2019-20 | 53 | 50 |
2020-21 | 33 | 33 |
2021-22 | 35 | 35 |
2022-23 | 77 | 77 |
2023-24 | 78 | 78 |
Total | 486 | 527 |
4.2 Country-wise Distribution of applications
The country-wise distribution of BAPA applications is detailed in Table 4-2 and Figure 4-2. More than half of BAPA applications are with one treaty partner, i.e., the United States of America. Other treaty partners with whom large number of applications have been filed in FY 2023-24 are the UK, Japan, Singapore, Germany and France.
Figure 4-2 Major countries to which BAPA applications filed in FY 2023-24 pertain
4.3 Status of Applications Filed
The status of applications filed is shown in Table 4-3 below. Out of a total 527 applications filed by 31st March 2024, a total of 184 applications have been disposed and 343 applications are under processing. A comparison of status of applications signed, disposed, and under processing for the BAPA applications filed till FY 2023-24 (as on 31st March, 2024) is presented in Figure 4-3.
Table 4-3 Status of BAPA applications filed
Sr. No. |
FY | Applications Filed (Post Conversion) |
Agreements Signed |
Applications disposed off due to other reasons |
Applications under processing |
A | B | C | D = A – B – C | ||
1 | 2012-13 | 37 | 26 | 8 | 3 |
2 | 2013-14 | 39 | 13 | 14 | 12 |
3 | 2014-15 | 30 | 18 | 6 | 6 |
4 | 2015-16 | 24 | 11 | 6 | 7 |
5 | 2016-17 | 25 | 11 | 3 | 11 |
6 | 2017-18 | 52 | 19 | 4 | 29 |
7 | 2018-19 | 47 | 14 | 3 | 30 |
8 | 2019-20 | 50 | 10 | 1 | 39 |
9 | 2020-21 | 33 | 10 | 4 | 20 |
10 | 2021-22 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 35 |
11 | 2022-23 | 77 | 3 | 0 | 74 |
12 | 2023-24 | 78 | 0 | 0 | 78 |
Total | 527 | 135 | 492 | 343 |
Figure 4-3 Status of BAPA applications filed till FY 2023-24, as on 31st March 2024
In the 135 BAPAs signed so far, CBDT has provided tax certainty for 645 assessment years. These 645 years include 203 years covered under the Rollback period of the concluded APAs. Out of the 135 Agreements, 65 have Rollback provisions. In FY 2023-24, the 39 BAPAs entered into have provided tax certainty totalling to 183 years. Of these 39 BAPAs, 18 BAPAs have Rollback period of 52 years.
4.4 Country wise status of application filed (post conversion)
The country-wise status of BAPA applications filed is shown in Table 4-4 and Figures 4-4-1 and 4-42 below. More than 70% of the total BAPA applications that are still under processing, are with 6 countries – the USA, the UK, Japan, Germany, Switzerland and Singapore. The maximum number of BAPAs signed so far have been with the USA followed by the UK and Japan.
Table 4-4 Status of applications filed
Sr. No. | Country | Applications Filed |
Agreements Signed |
Applications disposed off due to other reasons | Applications under Processing |
A | B | C | D = A – B – C | ||
1 | *USA | 244 | 69 | 13 | 162 |
2 | *UK | 80 | 19 | 23 | 38 |
3 | Japan | 45 | 16 | 2 | 27 |
4 | *Germany | 16 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
5 | Switzerland | 22 | 6 | 1 | 15 |
6 | Singapore | 22 | 6 | 2 | 14 |
7 | *Sweden | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
8 | *Finland | 15 | 3 | 1 | 11 |
9 | South Korea | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
10 | France | 8 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
11 | Canada | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
12 | Ireland | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
13 | Australia | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
14 | *The
Netherlands |
11 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
15 | *Denmark | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 |
16 | Luxembourg | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
17 | Italy | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
18 | New Zealand | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
19 | China | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
20 | Czech Republic |
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
21 | Belgium | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
22 | Indonesia | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
23 | Austria | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Total | 527 | 135 | 493 | 343 |
Figure 4-4-1 BAPAs signed
Figure 4-4-2 BAPA applications under processing
4.5 Agreements Signed – Year wise
The Table 4-5 and Figure 4-5 below show the year-wise details of BAPAs entered into till 31st March, 2024. As can be seen below, an increase of more than 21% in signing of BAPAs was achieved in FY 2023-24. Further, it can be seen that there is a steady increase in the signing of BAPA’s year on year basis indicating confidence in our resolutions with our treaty partners. This was made possible by the increasing frequency of communication with treaty partners, streamlined efforts by officers, and the growing maturity of the APA programme.
In FY 2023-24, out of the 39 Agreements signed with taxpayers, 24 pertained to the USA, 6 to Japan, 4 to Singapore, 2 to Australia and 1 each to the UK, Canada and Denmark.
Table 4-5 Year-wise BAPAs signed
FY | Agreements Signed |
2013-14 | 0 |
2014-15 | 1 |
2015-16 | 2 |
2016-17 | 8 |
2017-18 | 9 |
2018-19 | 11 |
2019-20 | 7 |
2020-21 | 13 |
2021-22 | 13 |
2022-23 | 32 |
2023-24 | 39 |
Total | 135 |
Figure 4-5 Year-wise BAPAs signed
4.6 Duration of Processing
In FY 2023-24, the average time taken to conclude BAPAs has been approximately 65.61 months. The detailed analysis of this is depicted in Table 4-6-1 and Figure 4-6-1 below. With intense negotiations with treaty partners, longstanding BAPAs were successfully concluded in this year, but the overall time taken in their resolution led to a high average processing time for the year. However, there was also a simultaneous focus on more expedient resolution of renewals in order to leverage the due diligence already done recently while processing original applications and ensure movement in a mixed-basket of cases. The average time taken for all BAPAs concluded till 31st March, 2024 is approximately 63.11 months. A number of BAPAs are actually resolved much before they are finally signed. However, due to several reasons such as the desire of the applicants to conclude both the unilateral and bilateral legs of the application together, the Applicant waiting to clear the draft of agreements through multiple levels of internal approvals etc., the formal signing takes longer even after bilateral resolution, which increases the final duration of processing of BAPAs.
Table 4-6-1 Duration of processing of BAPA applications
Sr. No. | Duration of processing | No. of Agreements signed during FY 2023-24 |
1 | Within 12 Months | 0 |
2 | 13-24 Months | 3 |
3 | 25-36 Months | 0 |
4 | 37-48 Months | 4 |
5 | 49-60 months | 9 |
6 | 61-72 months | 7 |
7 | 73-84 months | 11 |
8 | 85-96 months and above | 5 |
Total | 39 |
Figure 4-6-1 Duration of processing of all BAPAs signed during FY 2023-24
The cumulative figures for duration of processing of all BAPAs signed till 31st March 2024 are given in Table 4-6-2 and Figure 4-6-2 hereunder:
Table 4-6-2 Cumulative figures for duration of processing of BAPAs
Duration of processing | Agreements signed till 31st March 2024 |
Within 12 Months | 1 |
13-24 Months | 6 |
25-36 Months | 11 |
37-48 Months | 26 |
49-60 months | 31 |
61-72 months | 20 |
73-84 months | 25 |
85-96 months & above | 15 |
Total | 135 |
Figure 4-6-2 Duration of processing of all BAPAs signed till 31st March 2024
4.7 Distribution of agreements –Economic Activity wise
Table 4-7 and Figure 4-7 below capture the data regarding the economic activity or the pre-dominant economic activity in each of the BAPAs entered into during FY 2023-24. As in UAPAs, the service sector of the Indian economy has been the dominant sector that has been covered in BAPAs.
Table 4-7 Distribution of BAPAs as per economic activity
Sr. No | Economic Activity | Agreements Signed in FY 2023-24 |
1 | Service | 21 |
2 | Manufacturing, trading & services | 9 |
3 | Service & trading | 5 |
4 | Manufacturing & trading | 4 |
Total | 39 |
Figure 4-7 Economic activity distribution of BAPAs signed in FY 2023-24
4.8 Distribution of Agreements – Industry-wise
Table 4-8 and the Figure 4-8 below reveal that there are four broad industry categories that have been covered under BAPAs concluded in FY 2023-24. The Information Technology industry is the leading industry when it comes to being a part of the APA programme.
Table 4-8 Industry-wise distribution of BAPAs signed in FY 2023-24
Sr. No |
Industry | No. of Agreements Signed |
1 | Information Technology | 22 |
2 | Services | 13 |
3 | Pharmaceuticals/Chemicals | 2 |
4 | Automotive | 2 |
Total | 39 |
Figure 4-8 Industry-wise distribution of BAPAs
4.9 Nature of Covered Transactions
During FY 2023-24, the 39 BAPAs entered into had a total of 181 covered international transactions as depicted in Table 4-9 and Figure 4-9. As can be seen, a wide variety of transactions have been covered by the APAs signed in the year. Service-related transactions continue to lead in the transaction mix.
Table 4-9 Nature of covered transactions
Sr. No | Nature of Transactions | No. of Transactions |
1 | Provision of IT enabled/IT Services | 31 |
2 | Reimbursement and Recovery of expenses | 26 |
3 | Receivables and payables | 14 |
4 | Purchase of fixed assets | 8 |
5 | Purchase of products | 4 |
6 | Service fee income | 4 |
7 | Payment of royalties | 3 |
8 | Import of components, equipment and machines | 3 |
9 | Employee stock option | 3 |
10 | Advertising, marketing, and promotion | 3 |
11 | Provision of Design Engineering Services | 3 |
12 | Provision of Bock-office Support Services | 3 |
13 | Purchase of traded goods | 3 |
14 | Import/Export of rough diamonds | 3 |
15 | Import of materials | 2 |
16 | Import of capital assets | 2 |
17 | Receipt of services | 2 |
18 | Provision of service in the nature of TSS and AS | 2 |
19 | Import of components for consumption in the manufactured activity | 2 |
20 | Provision of shared support services | 2 |
21 | Purchase of capital assets/goods | 2 |
22 | Allocated Franchise Revenue, Unallocated Franchise Revenue, Credit items | 2 |
23 | Interest rates derivatives market-making businesses | 2 |
24 | Foreign exchange market-making businesses | 2 |
25 | Import of spares for resales to customers and sale of spares | 2 |
26 | Sale of goods | 2 |
27 | Commission income | 2 |
28 | Provision of technical consultancy services | 2 |
29 | Export of component and spares | 1 |
30 | Provision of business support services | 1 |
31 | Receipt for technology and know-how fee | 1 |
32 | Provision customer support services | 1 |
33 | Provision of accounting support services | 1 |
34 | Provision of analytics support services | 1 |
35 | Provision of Other Support Services | 1 |
36 | Provision of fixed assets | 1 |
37 | Provision of management services | 1 |
38 | Inter-company receivables, payables and advances | 1 |
39 | Provision of Export services | 1 |
40 | Purchase of TSS and AS contracts | 1 |
41 | Purchase of replacement product equipment | 1 |
42 | Receipt of management support services | 1 |
43 | Purchase of computer hardware | 1 |
44 | Payment for support services | 1 |
45 | Reimbursement of employee contribution | 1 |
46 | Reimbursement of employee stock ownership | 1 |
47 | Licensing of intangible assets | 1 |
48 | Provision of contract design and development services | 1 |
49 | Export of manufactured equipment/machinery, spares and components | 1 |
50 | Export of bought out finished goods | 1 |
51 | Export of finished goods | 1 |
52 | Payment of commission | 1 |
53 | Payment of IT support charges | 1 |
54 | Receipt of interest on delayed payments | 1 |
55 | Payment of internet service charges | 1 |
56 | Payment of repair and maintenance charges | 1 |
57 | Provision of marketing support services | 1 |
58 | Provision of off-shore data analytics | 1 |
59 | Receipt of intra Group Services/ other services | 1 |
60 | Payment of know-how/ licence fee | 1 |
61 | Purchase of finished good/ consumables | 1 |
62 | Provision of marketing & Sales Support Services | 1 |
63 | Provision of technical support services | 1 |
64 | Sale of products to AEs | 1 |
65 | Third party software/tools | 1 |
66 | Interest on External commercial borrowings | 1 |
67 | Import of fixed assets | 1 |
68 | Provision of lease line | 1 |
69 | Payment of interest on delayed payment | 1 |
70 | Payment of corporate guarantee fee | 1 |
Total | 181 |
Figure 4-9 Frequency of covered transactions
4.10 Transfer Pricing Methodology adopted
Table 4-10 and Figure 4-10 below shows a break up of Transfer Pricing Methodologies adopted in the signed cases.
Table 4-10 Frequency of usage of TP methods
Sr. No | TP Methodology | No. of Transactions |
1 | TNM Method | 156 |
2 | Other Method | 25 |
3 | CUP Method | – |
4 | Profit Split Method | – |
Total | 181 |
Figure 4-10 Frequency of usage of various TP methods to benchmark covered transactions in BAPA
4.11 Renewal of BAPAs
A large number of the applicants who have signed a BAPA with the CBDT have opted to file a renewal. This shows the trust reposed by the taxpayers in the APA programme and the preference for obtaining advance certainty rather than undergoing possible TP litigation and its related costs. Out of the 135 BAPAs signed till 31.03.2024, 66 applicants have opted for a renewal of the APA till date.
Chapter 5: Other dispute resolution processes
Another dispute resolution channel available under India’s Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs) is the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP). It is an alternate dispute resolution process involving two treaty partners, that seeks to remove taxation not in accordance with the DTAA arising from action by one or both treaty partners. India participates in the FTA MAP Forum of the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and shares its MAP statistics with the Forum. The statistics are available in the public domain.
MAP cases are negotiated by the Competent Authorities of India, namely the Joint Secretary (FT&TR-I) and Joint Secretary (FT&TR-II) in the CBDT, and other officers supporting them in this regard. The inventory of MAP cases in calendar year 2023 as also reported under MAP statistics with the OECD is detailed in Table 5-1 below. As can be seen from the table, the number of MAP cases closed in 2023 are substantially more than the number of new MAP applications invoked. As a result, the total number of MAP in India’s inventory is gradually reducing.
Table 5-1 MAP cases resolved in 2023
Sr.No. | Calendar Year |
Opening Inventory |
Invocations during the year | Closures during the year | Closing Inventory |
1 | 2023 | 7094 | 68 | 115 | 662 |
As can be seen from Figures 5-1 and 5-2, there has been a steady decline in closing inventory and a substantial number of cases being resolved under MAP each year. This is primarily due to the maturing of our relationships with treaty partners and efforts to increase frequency of communication with our treaty partners.
Figure 5-1 Pendency of cases in MAP inventory from 2019 onwards
Figure 5-2 Number of MAP applications closed by India and its treaty partners from 2019 onwards
Conclusion
The Indian APA programme is a very important part of CBDT’s efforts to enhance the ease of doing business in India and providing tax certainty to taxpayers. Since its commencement in July, 2012, the APA programme has resolved many complex transfer pricing issues which were otherwise prone to long drawn and expensive litigation.
The Indian APA programme has successfully achieved resolutions that are beneficial to both taxpayers and the Government. While taxpayers have managed to get certainty over transfer pricing issues for five to nine years (depending upon whether rollback provisions are applicable to an Agreement), the Government has been able to streamline limited resources on more productive work, including audits and other procedures.
APAs are also beneficial to the Government, as they assure tax revenues from multinationals on the basis of the terms and conditions embedded in the Agreements, without any further disputes and litigation. Though revenue mobilisation has never been the primary objective of the Indian APA programme, it is a positive externality flowing out from the programme that provides assured revenues to the Government of India. It is estimated that the 641 signed APAs have resulted in bringing finality in taxation to income of about Rs. 25,000 crores5. This translates into a payment of tax of about Rs. 7,500 Crores5. This is litigation-free and does not give rise to appellate proceedings. Though the APA programme has been successful in enabling a positive economic environment for multinationals doing business in India, the Government is committed to increase the efficacy of the programme further by providing it with adequate resources.
*****
1 Advance Pricing Agreement Guidance with FAQs released as part of Taxpayer Information Series No. 43
2 reconciliation with existing data
3 reconciliation with existing data
5 Estimates are based on the basis of data available on record
4 Opening inventory as per MAP statistics report